1 Year Later: Omnicare's Effect On Opinion Liability

Law360, New York (March 23, 2016, 10:19 AM EDT) -- One year ago, in Omnicare Inc. v. Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund, 135 S.Ct. 1318 (2015), the U.S. Supreme Court created a new test for opinion liability under Section 11 of the Securities Act, a strict liability statute that applies to material misrepresentations and omissions in a registration statement. The court stated that under the misrepresentation prong of Section 11, even if an opinion is objectively wrong, a statement of opinion is misleading only if the defendant did not believe it or if it contained other embedded factual statements that were untrue. To hold otherwise, the court wrote, is to ignore that a statement of opinion merely affirms "that the speaker actually holds the stated belief," not that the belief is correct....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!