Viking Pump Rebels Against NY Pro Rata Allocation Regime

Law360, New York (May 18, 2016, 2:52 PM EDT) -- In a landmark decision, the New York Court of Appeals broke with precedent mandating a pro rata allocation of long-term injury to consecutive liability policies. It held that, since the treatment of the injury in noncumulation provisions cannot be reconciled with the pro rata rationale, an all sums allocation will apply. Viking Pump Inc. v. TIG Insurance Co., — N.Y.3d —, (N.Y. May 3, 2016). The case is a departure from the pro rata approach adopted by the court in the Consolidated Edison case in 2002, which the court reinforced only three years ago.[1]...

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!