Lamictal Pay-For-Delay Case Not Best High Court Lure

By Eric Kroh (October 6, 2016, 7:15 PM EDT) -- The government has asked the U.S. Supreme Court not to review a Third Circuit decision in a pay-for-delay case against GlaxoSmithKline and Teva over the anticonvulsant Lamictal, and experts said the court ought to look elsewhere for a good vehicle to clarify its landmark 2013 holding in Actavis....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!