'Disparate Impact' Finally Gets Its Due

Law360, New York (October 7, 2014, 10:55 AM EDT) -- A definitive U.S. Supreme Court ruling concerning the viability of the disparate impact theory under the Fair Housing Act has proven elusive. In recent years, the court granted certiorari in two cases squarely presenting this issue, namely Magner v. Gallagher, 132 S. Ct. 548 (2011) and Township of Mount Holly, N.J. v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action Inc., 133 S. Ct. 2824 (2013). However, both cases settled prior to oral argument. On Oct. 2, 2014, the court granted certiorari to resolve this question in a case arising out of the Fifth Circuit, with perhaps far-reaching consequences for the existing fair-lending regulatory framework....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!