Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Fad et al v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:10-cv-05063
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Cowan DeBaets
- Eckert Seamans
- Greenberg Traurig
- Kramer Levin
- Mulholland & Knapp
- Ostrager Chong
- Patterson Belknap
- Paul Weiss
- Susman Godfrey
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 15, 2011
L'Oreal Dodges Class Cert. Bid In False Ad Suit
A New York federal judge ruled Wednesday that a group of hair salons could not bring classwide false advertising claims against L'Oreal USA Inc. and others, saying consumers' reactions upon learning certain products were not "salon-only" were likely too wide-ranging for certification.
-
January 11, 2011
Judge Keeps Salon-Only False Ad Action Alive
A federal judge has refused to toss a false advertising putative class action against L'Oreal USA Inc. and other cosmetic companies brought by a group dedicated to keeping products labeled for sale only in professional salons out of regular retail channels.