Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Sanchez et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
Case Number:
3:07-cv-05923
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Covington & Burling
- Donahue Fitzgerald
- Hagens Berman
- Himmelstein Law Network
- Lieff Cabraser
- Lynch Carpenter
- McCune Wright
- Milberg Coleman
- Orrick Herrington
- Panish Shea
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 22, 2015
McCuneWright To Appeal $19M Fee Award In Wells Fargo Deal
McCuneWright LLP attorneys who helped win a $203 million judgment against Wells Fargo NA for reordering customers' debit transactions to maximize overdraft fees said Friday they will appeal a California federal judge's order awarding $19 million in fees to McCuneWright and another firm, well below the $51 million requested.
-
May 22, 2015
Judge Caps Fee At $19M For Lieff Cabraser In Wells Fargo Win
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP won't be taking home the $51 million it sought for winning a $203 million overdraft fee class action judgment against Wells Fargo Bank NA, after a California federal judge said Thursday he couldn't justify the "unreasonable" fee, capping it at $19 million.
-
May 21, 2015
Lieff Cabraser Won't Get Full $51M In Wells Fargo Suit
A California federal judge said Thursday he'll likely grant Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP a "handsome" award for its help winning Wells Fargo Bank NA customers a $203 million judgment in a class action over the bank's overdraft fees, but not the $51 million it seeks.
-
March 30, 2015
Wells Fargo, Overdraft Counsel To Resolve $51M Fee Spat
Attorneys who won a $203 million judgment against Wells Fargo NA for reordering customers' debit transactions to maximize overdraft fees can't point to "subjective" information to justify their $51 million fee request as the parties enter limited discovery related to the disputed fees, a California federal judge ruled Friday.
-
February 17, 2015
Attys Want $51M In Wells Fargo Overdraft Class Action
Counsel for a class of consumers who won a $203 million judgment against Wells Fargo Bank NA on Tuesday asked a California federal judge for more than $51 million in attorneys' fees and costs, saying the fees are reasonable because they amount to the Ninth Circuit's 25 percent benchmark.
-
May 15, 2013
$203M Overdraft Fee Ruling Against Wells Fargo Reinstated
A California federal judge on Tuesday reinstated a $203 million class action penalty against Wells Fargo Bank NA for processing debits in a manner that maximized overdraft fees, finding that the bank's marketing materials violated fraud provisions of the state's consumer protection law.
-
May 02, 2013
Wells Fargo Class Wants $203M Overdraft Award Revived
A class of Wells Fargo Bank NA customers urged a California federal judge Thursday to reinstate his $203 million judgment against the bank for processing debits in a manner that maximized overdraft fees, four months after the Ninth Circuit reversed the award and remanded the case.