Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
MCDONOUGH et al v. TOYS "R" US et al
Case Number:
2:06-cv-00242
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Ahern & Associates
- Anderson Kill
- Barnes & Thornburg
- Blackwell Burke PA
- Cafferty Clobes
- Curtis Mallet-Prevost
- Dechert LLP
- Derek Smith Law Group
- Dorsey & Whitney
- Eckell Sparks
- Edelson Lechtzin
- Faruqi & Faruqi
- FeganScott
- Flaster Greenberg
- Gibbs Law Group
- Glancy Prongay
- Hagens Berman
- Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute
- Hawke McKeon
- Hunton Andrews
- Kaufman Coren
- Kilpatrick Townsend
- Lacy Price
- Latham & Watkins
- Lightman & Manochi
- Lowenstein Sandler
- Marshall Dennehey
- McShea Law Firm
- Miller Shah LLP
- Norris McLaughlin
- Offit Kurman
- Pollins Law Firm
- Reed Smith
- Reinhardt Wendorf
- Schnader Harrison
- Spector Roseman
- Troutman Pepper
- Weir Greenblatt
- Wolf Haldenstein
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 19, 2013
Toys R Us Revises Rejected $35M Antitrust Settlement
Toys R Us has reached an amended $35.5 million settlement of an antitrust class action alleging it restrain prices on baby products, after an earlier version of the accord was voided since consumers would've gotten a meager fraction of the money, according to a motion filed in Pennsylvania federal court Wednesday.
-
June 13, 2011
Regal Lager Ordered To Chip In On $35M Antitrust Deal
A Pennsylvania federal judge on Monday ordered Regal Lager Inc. to pay its portion of a $35 million settlement that resolved antitrust class actions alleging it and other baby products distributors colluded with Toys R Us to set vertical price restraints.
-
November 24, 2009
Baby Bjorn Distributor Wants Judgment In Price Case
Regal Lager Inc., a baby products distributor accused of colluding with Toys R Us, is seeking a ruling in its favor based on what it says is the plaintiffs' failure to meet pleading standards under Ashcroft v. Iqbal.
-
July 15, 2009
Five Subclasses Certified In Toys R Us Antitrust Suit
Five consumer subclasses were certified on Wednesday to pursue claims against baby-product manufacturers accused of colluding with Toys R Us to impose vertical price restraints on certain products in order to thwart discount competitors.