Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
October 09, 2007
Saffran, M.D., Ph.D., v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Case Number:
2:07-cv-00451
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Blank Rome
- Bradley Arant
- Hoffmann Marshall
- Jackson Walker LLP
- Latham & Watkins
- Patterson Belknap
- Venable LLP
- Williams Morgan
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
September 21, 2011
J&J Loses Bid For New Trial In $482M Stent Patent Case
Johnson & Johnson on Tuesday suffered a blow in its battle to dodge a $482 million verdict against it for allegedly infringing a New Jersey radiologist's coronary stent patent, with a Texas federal judge denying J&J's request for a new trial.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login