Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Alexander-Jones v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al
Case Number:
3:10-cv-03005
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 02, 2013
Female Wal-Mart Workers Again Denied Class Cert.
A California federal judge on Friday once again denied class certification to a group of female workers claiming that Wal-Mart Stores Inc. discriminated against them in terms of pay and promotions, ruling the complaint still fails to allege a common question between putative class members.
-
January 24, 2012
Wal-Mart Escapes ERISA Class Action In Light Of Dukes
A California federal judge on Tuesday dismissed a proposed class action against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. seeking to piggyback off Wal-Mart v. Dukes, ruling employees can't sue Wal-Mart for undercontributing to women's retirement plans unless it is found liable for sex discrimination in wages that determine contribution amounts.
-
September 27, 2011
Wal-Mart Cites Dukes In Bid To Nix ERISA Class Action
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. on Monday told a California federal court that a putative class action accusing it of underpaying retirement benefits because of gender-based compensation discrimination should be dismissed in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's Dukes decision.