Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
January 17, 2006
United States of America et al v. J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Case Number:
5:06-cv-00055
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baker McKenzie
- Best Best & Krieger
- Bird Marella
- Colantuono Highsmith
- Constantine Cannon
- Day Pitney
- Faegre Drinker
- Foley & Lardner
- Gibson Dunn
- Hanson Bridgett
- Holland & Knight
- Hueston Hennigan
- Jeffer Mangels
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Lewis Brisbois
- McDermott Will & Emery
- McKool Smith
- Paul Weiss
- Phillips & Cohen LLP
- Russ August & Kabat
- Sheppard Mullin
- Venable LLP
- Winston & Strawn
- Wolf Rifkin
Companies
- Alameda County Water District Inc.
- Dublin San Ramon Services District
- Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
- Irvine Ranch Water District Inc.
- JM Eagle
- Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
- Rancho California Water District
- Valley Center Municipal Water District
- Western Municipal Water District
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 22, 2021
J-M's Atty Fee Plan In Bad Pipes Row Too Slow, Judge Says
A California federal judge told J-M Manufacturing on Monday he will likely rule against its proposed approach to determining attorney fees after municipalities convinced a jury the company violated the False Claims Act but failed to win any damages, saying J-M's proposal would take "many, many, many, many, many, many months."
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login