Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Summer York v. Starbucks Corporation et al
Case Number:
2:08-cv-07919
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Akin Gump
- Baron & Budd
- Capstone Law APC
- Clarkson Law Firm PC
- Gordon Rees
- Levinson Arshonsky
- McLeod & Witham
- Robins Kaplan
- Sidley Austin
- Westrick Law
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 28, 2013
Judge Slashes Attys' Fees In $4.9M Starbucks Wage Deal
A California federal judge on Monday gave final approval to a $4.9 million settlement of a wage-and-hour class action against Starbucks Corp. — a deal that includes a $1.9 million attorneys' fee award representing less than half of what plaintiffs' counsel originally requested.
-
September 16, 2013
Starbucks Objects To 'Astonishing' $4.5M Attys' Fees
Starbucks Corp. on Friday blasted an "astonishing" $4.5 million attorneys' fee request by the lead plaintiff in a wage-and-hour class action against the mega-chain that was settled earlier this year for $3 million.
-
June 10, 2013
Judge Backs Starbucks' $3M Meal Break Settlement
After more than four years of litigation, a California federal judge on Monday preliminarily approved a $3 million settlement of a wage-and-hour class action alleging Starbucks Corp. effectively denied California workers off-duty breaks because its coffeehouses were always busy and understaffed.
-
May 13, 2013
Starbucks Reaches $3M Settlement In Wage Class Action
Starbucks Corp. agreed to pay $3 million to resolve a class action filed by workers in California alleging the company denied them required meal breaks and issued inaccurate wage statements, according to documents filed in California federal court Friday.
-
July 31, 2012
Ex-Starbucks Barista Seeks New Break Subclasses Post-Brinker
An ex-Starbucks Corp. worker asked a federal court Monday to reconsider certifying three subclasses in a suit against the coffee giant in light of the California Supreme Court's landmark Brinker decision, which she said forbids employers from pressuring workers to forgo proper meal and rest breaks.
-
July 06, 2011
Starbucks Asks Judge To Revisit Wage Statement Claim
Starbucks Corp. on Tuesday asked a federal judge to reconsider his decision to let stand a claim in a proposed class action that the coffee chain provided its California baristas with itemized wage statements that made it difficult to calculate total hours worked.
-
September 24, 2009
Starbucks Presses For Cert. Denial In Calif. OT Action
Starbucks Inc. is aiming to snuff out a putative class action alleging that the company doesn’t allow employees at its California stores to take proper meal breaks, preemptively asking a federal judge to deny class certification.