Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Miller UK Ltd. et al v. Caterpillar, Inc.
Case Number:
1:10-cv-03770
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 03, 2017
$74M Caterpillar Trade-Secrets Verdict Stands
An Illinois federal judge refused Friday to disturb a jury's $74 million verdict against Caterpillar Inc. for theft of trade secrets from rival Miller UK — or to disturb a simultaneous $1 million verdict against Miller for defamation.
-
May 06, 2016
Caterpillar Seeks To Undo $74M Trade Secrets Verdict
Caterpillar Inc. has urged an Illinois federal judge to step in and undo a jury's $74 million verdict in favor of earthmoving equipment supplier Miller UK Ltd for allegedly stealing trade secrets, on Friday saying that the information it allegedly stole was never identified as confidential.
-
February 12, 2016
Caterpillar Owes Interest On $74M Verdict, Miller Says
Earthmoving equipment supplier Miller UK Ltd. told an Illinois federal court Thursday it should receive interest on its $74 million jury verdict against Caterpillar Inc. for stealing trade secrets, arguing that precedent warrants interest when a party breaks a confidential relationship.
-
December 21, 2015
Caterpillar Hit With $74M Verdict In Trade Secrets Case
Caterpillar Inc. has been ordered by an Illinois federal jury to pay earthmoving equipment supplier Miller UK Ltd. nearly $74 million after being found guilty of using a supply contract to steal Miller's trade secrets.
-
November 16, 2012
Caterpillar Seeks Sanctions In Miller Trade Secrets Suit
In a bitter trans-Atlantic trade secrets dispute between two earthmoving manufacturers, Caterpillar Inc. asked an Illinois federal court on Thursday to impose $20,000 in sanctions, claiming Miller UK Ltd. stonewalled a recent deposition and dragged its feet in discovery.
-
December 22, 2011
Caterpillar Blasts Kirkland & Ellis' Discovery Requests
Caterpillar Inc. on Wednesday objected to Miller UK Ltd.'s counsel Kirkland & Ellis LLP's discovery requests in Illinois federal court, calling them excessive and beyond the scope of Miller's contract and trade secrets suit against the construction giant.