Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Calibuso et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
Case Number:
2:10-cv-01413
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Law Offices of Frederick K. Brewington
- Lieff Cabraser
- Outten & Golden
- Proskauer Rose
- Stowell & Friedman
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 02, 2013
$39M Merrill Lynch Deal Won't Stop Sex Bias, Judge Told
A group of female financial advisers employed by Bank of America Corp. and its Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. unit urged a New York federal judge Friday to reject a proposed $39 million class action gender discrimination settlement, saying the deal would "enshrine" sex bias on Wall Street.
-
September 06, 2013
BofA To Pay $39M To Settle Sex Bias Class Action
Bank of America Corp. and Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. have agreed to pay $39 million to settle a class action brought by women employed as financial advisers for alleged discrimination in compensation and business opportunities, according to a motion filed Friday in New York federal court.
-
September 27, 2012
BofA Can't Use Dukes To Kill Class Claims In Sex Bias Suit
A New York federal judge on Thursday denied Bank of America Corp.'s bid to nix class claims in a lawsuit accusing the company of underpaying female financial advisers, saying the bank's argument that the U.S. Supreme Court's Dukes decision precluded those claims was premature.
-
August 09, 2011
BofA Says Dukes Thwarts Sex Bias Action
Citing the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Wal-Mart v. Dukes, Bank of America Corp. on Tuesday asked a New York federal judge to dismiss a similar class action brought by female employees who claim they are underpaid compared with men.