Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Fort Worth Employees' Retirement Fund v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
Case Number:
1:09-cv-03701
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Barack Ferrazzano
- Boies Schiller
- Cahill Gordon
- Kaplan Hecker
- Kelley Drye
- Landis Rath
- Paul Weiss
- Robbins Geller
- Satterlee Stephens
- Sidley Austin
- Sullivan & Cromwell
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 04, 2015
Robbins Geller's Fees Slashed To $74M In JPMorgan MBS Suit
A New York federal judge on Friday awarded Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP $74 million in fees and expenses for its work in securing a $388 million settlement of a class action accusing JPMorgan Chase of misrepresenting mortgage-backed securities, below the $100.8 million the firm had sought.
-
September 23, 2015
Robbins Geller Wants $100M Fee In JPMorgan MBS Suit
Attorneys with Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP asked a New York federal judge Tuesday to grant them $100 million in attorneys' fees and costs for their work securing a $388 million settlement of a class action accusing JPMorgan Chase & Co. of misrepresenting mortgage-backed securities.
-
July 17, 2015
JPMorgan Puts Up $388M To End MBS Class Action
JPMorgan Chase & Co. has agreed to shell out $388 million to end an investor class action in New York federal court accusing the financial giant of misrepresenting underwriting standards for $10 billion worth of mortgage-backed securities, according to court filings on Friday.
-
September 30, 2014
Investors In $10B JPMorgan MBS Suit Get Partial Cert.
A New York federal judge on Tuesday partially certified a class of investors accusing JPMorgan Chase & Co. of falsely representing underwriting standards for $10 billion worth of mortgage-backed securities, but ruled the plaintiffs failed to show that their damages could be determined on a classwide basis.
-
May 09, 2013
Judge Wants Secret Witnesses Named In JPMorgan Suit
A federal magistrate judge in New York on Tuesday ordered class action plaintiffs pursuing fraud claims against JPMorgan Chase & Co. related to failed, allegedly falsely represented mortgage-backed securities to turn over the identities of 15 confidential witnesses to the bank.