Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Christopher Mendoza v. Nordstrom Inc et al
Case Number:
8:10-cv-00109
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 28, 2012
Nordstrom Defeats Workers' Day-Of-Rest Claims
A California federal judge recently ruled in favor of Nordstrom Inc. on a pair of workers' claims that the retailer violated state law by having them work for more than six consecutive days, casting doubt on the plaintiffs' ability to bring a representative action.
-
May 03, 2012
PAGA Action Withstands Nordstrom's Legal Broadside
A California federal judge let a Private Attorneys General Act representative action accusing Nordstrom Inc. of violating state law by having employees work for seven or more consecutive days move forward Wednesday, chiding Nordstrom for trying to introduce claims that PAGA was unconstitutional.