Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al

  1. March 08, 2023

    Halo Gets Interest But Not New Trial After Yearslong IP Row

    A Nevada federal judge has refused to extend Halo Electronics' nearly 16-year patent dispute over hardware packaging after the technology maker scored seven-figure damages back in 2012, denying the company's bid for a new trial on damages but agreeing to grant prejudgment interest.

  2. August 15, 2022

    Halo Fights 'Draconian' Suggestion IP Suit May Be Tossed

    Halo Electronics Inc. is fighting back against a Nevada federal judge's suggestion in July that the remainder of its long-running patent suit against Pulse Electronics Inc. could be dismissed, thereby cutting off its bid for another damages trial on prejudgment interest.

  3. July 27, 2022

    It Might Be Too Late For Halo's Patent Case, Judge Warns

    A Nevada federal judge said Wednesday that it might still be too late for Halo Electronics to take its decadelong and U.S. Supreme Court-precedent-setting patent saga to a jury again, even though the Federal Circuit had revived the case earlier this year.

  4. July 31, 2020

    Transformer Co. Wants IP Damages Trial After WesternGeco

    Halo Electronics Inc. on Thursday urged a Nevada federal judge to hold a damages trial several years after the conclusion of its patent infringement dispute with a rival transformer maker, arguing a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court ruling means it can seek a new set of damages.

  5. September 06, 2017

    Halo Fails To Meet 'Halo' Standard For Enhanced IP Damages

    Halo Electronics Inc. failed to establish that a rival’s conduct met new conditions for awarding enhanced damages set by the U.S. Supreme Court in a long-running infringement case over transformer patents that prompted the high court to reset that standard in the first place, a Nevada federal judge ruled Wednesday.

  6. October 25, 2016

    'Time Has Come' For Enhanced Patent Damages, Halo Says

    Halo Electronics Inc. urged Nevada's federal court on Monday to award it enhanced damages following the U.S. Supreme Court's June ruling in the case relaxing the previously strict test for awarding them, saying "the time has come" for the court to determine the consequences of Pulse Electronics Inc.'s willful infringement.

  7. April 28, 2016

    Pulse, Halo Fight Over Interest In Transformer Patent Row

    Pulse and Halo's long-running transformer patent dispute, which has made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, turned Wednesday to the issue of interest, and exactly how much Pulse owes after a jury slapped it with a $1.5 million infringement verdict in 2013.

  8. June 20, 2013

    Halo Wins Injunction In Pulse Transformer IP Suit

    A Nevada federal judge on Monday imposed a permanent injunction halting the U.S. sales of electronic devices containing Pulse Electronics Corp.'s surface-mount transformers, the packaging of which a jury found infringed three patents belonging to Halo Electronics Inc.

  9. May 28, 2013

    $1.5M Halo Jury Verdict In Pulse Patent Suit Affirmed By Judge

    A Nevada federal judge on Tuesday entered a $1.5 million judgment in favor of Halo Electronics Inc. in its patent infringement suit accusing Pulse Electronics Corp. of infringing three patents for packaging that houses surface mount transformers in electronic devices, affirming an earlier jury verdict.

  10. November 28, 2012

    Halo Scores $1.5M Verdict In Pulse Electronics Patent Suit

    A federal jury in Nevada awarded Halo Electronics Inc. $1.5 million on Monday after finding Pulse Electronics Corp. infringed three patents for packaging that houses surface mount transformers, which are used in computers and other electronic devices.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!