Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Nash v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
Case Number:
1:09-cv-00079
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 25, 2013
CVS Must Pay Up In Fight Over $34M OT Settlement
A Rhode Island federal judge ruled against CVS Caremark Corp. on Monday in a fight over an allegedly underfunded $34 million overtime class action settlement, holding that a clerical error didn't relieve CVS of its obligation to cough up an additional $2 million.
-
February 19, 2013
CVS Denies Underfunding $34M OT Settlement
CVS Caremark Corp. fought back Friday against claims that it had underfunded a $34 million overtime settlement with thousands of assistant store managers, saying an error by the settlement administrator was to blame.
-
January 30, 2013
CVS Is Underfunding $34M OT Settlement, Plaintiffs Say
Fourteen months after CVS Caremark Corp. agreed to pay $34 million to resolve claims that the pharmacy failed to pay proper overtime to assistant store managers, the class members complained Tuesday that CVS was underfunding the settlement.
-
November 30, 2011
CVS' $34M Overtime Settlement Faces Questions
A federal judge Wednesday questioned the fairness of a proposed $34 million class action settlement with CVS Pharmacy Inc. in 11 wage-and-hour suits over the pharmacy services provider's alleged failure to pay proper overtime to assistant store managers.