Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Dan Katz v. China Century Dragon Media, Inc. et al
Case Number:
2:11-cv-02769
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Baker McKenzie
- Chapman Glucksman
- Cozen O'Connor
- FisherBroyles
- Loeb & Loeb
- Pryor Cashman
- Rosen Law Firm PA
- Wilson Elser
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 11, 2013
China Dragon Reaches Deal With Investors Over Inflated IPO
A California federal judge on Thursday approved a settlement between shareholders and some of the defendants in a class action claiming U.S advertising company China Century Dragon Media Inc. inflated revenues from its Chinese television commercials to boost its stock price for a 2011 initial public offering.
-
December 20, 2012
Investors Win Class Cert. In Suit Over Ad Co.'s IPO
A California federal judge on Tuesday certified a class of China Century Dragon Media Inc. shareholders who claim the U.S. advertising company inflated revenues from its commercials on Chinese television to boost its 2011 stock sale.
-
March 08, 2012
Chinese Media Co.'s IPO Wasn't Misleading, Court Hears
A group of defendants including private equity firm Aegis Capital Corp. asked a California federal judge on Wednesday to dismiss an amended suit brought by investors claiming a U.S. advertising company inflated revenues from its commercials on Chinese television to boost its 2011 stock sale.
-
December 01, 2011
Ad Co. Dodges Investor Action Over Chinese Profit Claims
A California federal judge on Wednesday dismissed a proposed class action claiming a U.S. advertising company falsely reported huge revenues from its commercials on Chinese television in order to drum up investor interest in a February initial public offering.
-
November 10, 2011
Chinese TV Co. Asks Judge To Boot Securities Class Action
A Chinese television advertising company asked a California federal judge on Thursday to dismiss a proposed securities class action accusing the company of falsifying its financial statements, arguing that the investors' lawsuit doesn't allege any specific frauds.