Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
April 25, 2011
Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Case Number:
6:11-cv-00201
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Cole Schotz
- Cozen O'Connor
- Dentons
- Duane Morris
- Egan Enders
- Findlay Craft
- Finnegan
- Jackson Walker LLP
- Jeffer Mangels
- Kaufman Dolowich
- Latham & Watkins
- Mayer Brown
- Norton Rose
- Pachulski Stang
- Parsons McEntire
- Perkins Coie
- Wilson Sonsini
- Yarbrough Wilcox
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 05, 2018
Gilstrap Doubles $4M Jury Verdict In LCD Patent Row
U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on Monday ordered Chi Mei Innolux Corp. to pay competitor Eidos Display LLC more than $8 million for infringing a patent tied to LCD displays, doubling a jury's verdict as punishment for Innolux's repeated discovery misconduct and lack of investigation into the infringement claims.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login