Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
SK Hynix , Inc. et al v. Rambus, Inc.
Case Number:
5:00-cv-20905
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Axinn Veltrop
- Banner Witcoff
- Bunsow De Mory
- DLA Piper
- Duane Morris
- Fish & Richardson
- Foley & Lardner
- Freitas & Weinberg
- Gibson Dunn
- Hawkinson Yang
- Hopkins & Carley
- Jones Day
- Katten Muchin
- Kilpatrick Townsend
- King & Spalding
- Latham & Watkins
- Littler Mendelson
- McGuireWoods
- McKool Smith
- Mintz Levin
- Munger Tolles
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Orrick Herrington
- Paul Hastings
- Quinn Emanuel
- Radulescu LLP
- Sidley Austin
- Simpson Thacher
- Skadden Arps
- Weil Gotshal
- Wilson Sonsini
Companies
- Conversant Intellectual Property Management Inc.
- Micron Technology Inc.
- NVIDIA Corp.
- Rambus Inc.
- RELX PLC
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- SK Hynix Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 11, 2013
Rambus, Hynix Ink $240M Deal Ending Patent Saga
Technology company Rambus Inc. and South Korean memory semiconductor supplier SK Hynix Inc. have signed a $240 million, five-year licensing agreement for the use of Rambus memory-related patent innovations in Hynix's semiconductor products, settling all claims in their long-running patent dispute, Rambus announced Tuesday.
-
May 09, 2013
Rambus Loses $250M Of Hynix Win For Destroying Evidence
A California federal judge on Wednesday hit Rambus Inc. with $250 million in sanctions for egregious evidence destruction in its long-running patent case against Hynix Semiconductor Inc., drastically reducing the $397 million judgment Rambus won in 2009.
-
October 18, 2012
Hynix Aims To Shoot Down $397M Rambus Patent Judgment
Hynix Semiconductor Inc. asked a California federal judge Tuesday to either throw out a $397 million judgment for infringing Rambus Inc. patents or grant the chipmaker a new trial in its decadelong fight over memory chip technology, saying recent patent re-examination proceedings merit reversal.
-
September 24, 2012
Rambus' Royalties From Hynix Reduced Over Destroyed Docs
Rambus Inc.'s destruction of documents related to memory chip patents it planned to assert against Hynix Semiconductor Inc. merits a downgrade in a $400 million penalty assessed against Hynix, but neither dismissal nor a new trial is warranted, a California federal judge ruled Friday.