Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
IN RE: GROUPON, INC., MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Case Number:
3:11-md-02238
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Amamgbo & Associates
- Audet & Partners
- Auer Ryan PC
- Bolen Robinson
- Carney Gillespie
- Cuneo Gilbert
- DLA Piper
- Fenwick & West
- Johnson Fistel
- Levin Sedran
- Lynch Carpenter
- Miller Nash LLP
- Newman Du Wors
- Quinn Emanuel
- Robbins Geller
- Strange & Butler
- Wanta Thome
- Wites Law Firm
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 24, 2016
Atty's Role In $8.5M Groupon Deal Doesn't Elicit Fee Cut
An attorney claiming she aided an $8.5 million deal ending multidistrict litigation between consumers and Groupon Inc. over short-dated online vouchers was denied fees for her efforts Wednesday by a California federal judge who concluded she had no impact on the settlement's size.
-
February 22, 2016
Atty Calls Groupon Class Outcry Over Husband's Fee Baseless
An attorney claiming she aided an $8.5 million deal ending multidistrict litigation between consumers and Groupon Inc. over short-dated online vouchers on Friday urged a California federal court to ignore the consumers outcry over paying her part of the settlement, saying attacks on her counsel and husband are unwarranted.
-
February 16, 2016
Groupon Class Says Atty's Husband Had No Role In $8M Deal
A group of consumers that recently reached an $8.5 million deal with Groupon Inc. to end multidistrict litigation over allegedly short-dated online vouchers on Friday pushed a California federal court to reject an attorney and her husband's move to score 10 percent of the settlement, calling it a deceitful money grab.
-
February 01, 2016
Groupon Says $8.5M Deal Should End MDL Claims For Good
Groupon Inc. asked a California federal court to approve an $8.5 million deal that would end multidistrict litigation over its allegedly short-dated online vouchers on Friday, about a year after the Ninth Circuit shot down a prior settlement.
-
December 18, 2012
Groupon's $8.5M MDL Settlement Approved On 2nd Try
A California federal judge on Tuesday approved Groupon Inc.'s $8.5 million settlement with plaintiffs in multidistrict litigation over certificates sold with allegedly illegal expiration dates, after the parties dropped a charitable award to non-class members that the judge had deemed inappropriate.
-
September 28, 2012
$8.5M Groupon MDL Deal Blocked Over Cy Pres Award
A California federal judge declined Friday to approve Groupon Inc.'s $8.5 million settlement with the plaintiffs in multidistrict litigation accusing the daily deals giant of selling certificates with illegal expiration dates, taking issue with the settlement's cy pres award.
-
March 30, 2012
Groupon To Pay $8.5M To End MDL Over Shortdated Deals
Groupon Inc. has reached an $8.5 million settlement with the plaintiffs in multidistrict litigation accusing the daily deal giant of selling certificates with illegal expiration dates, according to documents filed in California federal court Thursday.