Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Worldwide Home Products, Inc. v. Time, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:11-cv-03633
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
December 16, 2015
Fed. Circ. Affirms Finding Of 'Vexatious' Conduct By Atty
The Federal Circuit on Wednesday rejected a bid by an attorney that it reverse a New York federal court's determination that he had acted improperly in a patent infringement suit filed against Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. that was found to have been brought in bad faith.
-
April 15, 2015
Worldwide Flags Error In Bed Bath & Beyond Attys' Fee Award
Worldwide Home Products Inc., which was recently ordered to pay Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. nearly $820,000 in attorneys' fees and costs after it beat Worldwide's patent infringement suit, told a New York federal judge on Wednesday that the award should be reduced by about $15,000 due to an inadvertent clerical error.
-
April 10, 2015
Bed Bath & Beyond Wins Atty Fees In Hanger Patent Suit
A New York federal judge on Thursday awarded Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. nearly $900,000 in attorney fees and costs after beating a patent suit brought by Worldwide Home Products Inc., ruling the lawsuit was brought in bad faith because Worldwide's former attorney withheld material information from patent examiners before filing the complaint.
-
March 05, 2015
Bed Bath Not Owed Attys Fees Under Octane, Judge Hears
After losing a patent infringement case against Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. because of the prior misconduct of an attorney, Worldwide Home Products Inc. recently told a federal court that it should not have to fork over attorneys' fees because the suit was not frivolous.
-
February 12, 2015
Bed Bath & Beyond Again Prevails On Inequitable Conduct
A New York federal judge on Wednesday invalidated a clothing hanger patent asserted against Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. after granting the plaintiff reconsideration of an earlier finding that the plaintiff's former attorney had intentionally misled U.S. patent authorities about the features of a previously existing product.
-
October 08, 2013
Bed Bath & Beyond Shows Inequitable Conduct To Nix Patent
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. successfully invalidated a clothing hanger patent asserted against the retailer, by convincing a New York federal judge that the plaintiff's attorney intentionally misled U.S. patent authorities about the characteristics of a previously existing product.