Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Martignago v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:11-cv-03923
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 15, 2013
Merrill Lynch To Pay $12M To Settle OT Suit
Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. agreed Friday to pay $12 million to settle a class and collective action lawsuit in New York federal court alleging the Bank of America Corp. subsidiary failed to pay proper overtime to its client associates.
-
January 13, 2012
Merrill Lynch OT Action Stays In NY
A putative class action that claims Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. underpaid administrative staff's overtime will stay in a New York court, a federal judge ruled Friday, denying the Bank of America Corp. subsidiary's bid to kick the case to Texas.
-
August 12, 2011
Merrill Wants Sex Bias, OT Action Moved To Texas
Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. told a New York federal judge on Friday that a female employee's proposed class action alleging gender bias and claiming client associates were denied proper overtime pay belonged in Texas federal court.
-
June 14, 2011
Merrill Lynch Associate Sues Over 'Unfair' Pay Method
A veteran employee of Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. lodged a complaint in New York on Thursday, claiming the financial firm's "supplemental compensation" policy not only denies a proposed class of client associates proper overtime pay, but also discriminates against female workers.