Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Kerry Moriarty v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
Case Number:
2:11-cv-05844
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 21, 2011
JPMorgan, Customers End Call Recording Action
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA on Thursday resolved a putative class action alleging the banking giant violated California law by recording outbound calls to customers without providing notice or gaining consent.
-
August 12, 2011
Calif. Privacy Law Shouldn't Apply To NY Calls: JPMorgan
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA argued Thursday that the U.S. Constitution's commerce clause barred a putative class action accusing the mortgage loan servicer of violating California law by recording outbound calls to customers without providing notice or gaining consent.