Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Association of California Water Agencies Joint Powers Insurance Authority et al v. The Insurance Company of The State of Pennsylvania et al
Case Number:
8:11-cv-01124
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Alexander Law Group LLP
- Arnall Golden
- Barber & Bauermeister
- Berger Kahn
- Clark Hill
- Cozen O'Connor
- Crowell & Moring
- Engstrom Lipscomb
- Greenberg Traurig
- Hayes Scott
- Kendall Brill & Kelly
- Kronick Moskovitz
- Law Offices of Geraldine Ly
- Law Offices of Richard A. Jones
- Lewis Brisbois
- McCurdy & Fuller
- Musick Peeler
- Severson & Werson
- Sheppard Mullin
- Yukevich Cavanaugh
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 09, 2014
AIG, Allied Pay $60M To Settle Wildfire Coverage Row
Two American International Group Inc. units and Allied World National Assurance Co. on Friday agreed to pay $60 million to settle claims that they had failed to properly cover a California water district in a $69 million award in lawsuits blaming the district for property damage from a 2008 wildfire.
-
August 13, 2013
AIG Unit Again Faces Bad Faith Claim In $69M Wildfire Row
A California federal judge on Friday reversed a colleague's decision to toss a bad faith claim against an American International Group Inc. unit contesting coverage of a $69 million award in lawsuits that blamed a water district for property damage from a 2008 wildfire.
-
April 01, 2013
AIG Unit Can't Exit Early From $69M Wildfire Coverage Suit
A California federal judge on Friday tossed a bad faith claim but denied a quick overall win to an American International Group Inc. unit contesting coverage of a $69 million award in lawsuits blaming a water district for property damage from a 2008 fire.
-
October 03, 2012
Wildfire Victims Seek Share Of $69M Award From Insurers
Homeowners victimized by a 2008 California wildfire asked a federal judge Tuesday to allow them to intervene in a water district's lawsuit seeking coverage from several insurers, saying they haven't been able to collect their part of a $69 million judgment because of the insurers' actions.
-
September 04, 2012
Insurer Asks To Exit Water District's Wildfire Coverage Suit
An excess insurer said Friday it had no duty to cover a California water district that's seeking up to $19 million in coverage for lawsuits by owners of burned-down homes who allege the district designed a water supply system inadequate for fighting a 2008 wildfire.
-
March 20, 2012
Calif. Water District Gets Tentative OK In Coverage Suit
A California federal judge on Monday tentatively denied a Pennsylvania excess insurer's motion to toss a Golden State water district's complaint seeking up to $19 million in coverage for nine lawsuits alleging the district designed a water supply system inadequate for fighting a 2008 wildfire.
-
August 05, 2011
Insurers Seek To Douse Calif. Wildfire Coverage Suit
Two excess insurers sought Wednesday to toss a complaint brought in California federal court by a water district seeking to win coverage of nine lawsuits that claim it designed a water supply system that was inadequate for fighting a 2008 wildfire.