Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

August 11, 2011

Zino, Jr. et al v. Whirlpool Corporation et al

Track this case

Case Number:

5:11-cv-01676

See also:

Court:

Ohio Northern

Nature of Suit:

Labor: E.R.I.S.A.

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Benita Y. Pearson

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Coverage

  1. October 30, 2015

    Whirlpool Beats Some Retirees' Benefits Claims After Tackett

    An Ohio federal judge on Friday ruled that Whirlpool Corp. wasn't obligated to pay health care benefits to some retired workers in a benefits class action, determining their claims couldn't survive after the U.S. Supreme Court's Tackett decision.

1 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View the parties now

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!