Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
American International Group, Inc. et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
Case Number:
1:11-cv-06212
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
- American Home Assurance Co.
- American International Group Inc.
- Bank of America Corp.
- First Franklin Corp.
- Lexington Insurance Co.
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 16, 2013
BofA Wants To Keep $10.5B RMBS Suit In Federal Court
Bank of America NA on Wednesday pressed a New York federal judge to reject American International Group Inc.'s motion to move a $10.5 billion lawsuit over residential mortgage-backed securities to state court, arguing that remanding the case would dangerously split the case between federal and state courts and would adversely affect certain bankruptcy proceedings.
-
April 25, 2012
2nd Circ. Will Hear AIG's $10B RMBS Suit Against BofA
The Second Circuit on Wednesday agreed to hear American International Group Inc.'s appeal of a New York federal judge's refusal to send its $10 billion suit against Bank of America Corp. over residential mortgage-backed securities back to state court.
-
December 07, 2011
Quinn Emanuel Stays Put In AIG's Battle With BofA
American International Group Inc.'s legal team can continue to represent the insurance giant in its lawsuit against Bank of America Corp. over mortgage-backed securities, after a New York federal judge on Tuesday denied the bank's request to disqualify Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP for a conflict of interest.
-
October 21, 2011
AIG Can't Move $10B BofA Suit To State Court: Judge
A New York federal judge on Thursday refused to send American International Group Inc.'s $10 billion suit against Bank of America Corp. over residential mortgage-backed securities back to a state court.
-
October 18, 2011
BofA Wants Quinn Emanuel Ousted From AIG's $10B Suit
Bank of America Corp. sought Monday to remove Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP from representing American International Group Inc. in its $10 billion suit against BofA over mortgage-backed securities, contending a partner at the firm has confidential information about the bank.