Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
POOL et al v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY et al
Case Number:
1:11-cv-01733
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Covington & Burling
- Dentons
- DLA Piper
- Gibson Dunn
- Miller & Chevalier
- Motley Rice
- O'Hagan Meyer
- Shackelford Bowen
- Shook Hardy
- Thompson O'Donnell
- White & Case
- Wiley Rein
- Williams & Connolly
- WilmerHale
- Wilson Elser
- Winstead PC
Companies
- ACADEMI LLC
- AECOM
- American International Group Inc.
- Chubb Ltd.
- CNA Financial Corp.
- DynCorp International Inc.
- Exelis
- G4S
- KBR Inc.
- US Investigations Services LLC
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 21, 2012
Judge Ends $2B Benefits Action Against Halliburton, Insurers
A Washington, D.C., federal judge on Friday tossed a $2 billion proposed class action accusing government contractors and insurance carriers, including Halliburton Corp. and Continental Casualty Co., of withholding health benefits from badly wounded workers, calling the lawsuit an end-run around required administrative review.
-
July 16, 2012
Halliburton, KBR Say Law Blocks $2B Insurance Denial Suit
Halliburton Corp. and KBR Inc. on Friday asked a Washington federal judge to toss a $2 billion proposed class action accusing them of war profiteering through denied health insurance claims to employees working under government contracts, arguing the suit is blocked by the Defense Base Act.