Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Daniel et al v. Ford Motor Company
Case Number:
2:11-cv-02890
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 26, 2018
Jury Clears Ford In Faulty Focus Suspension Class Action
A California federal jury on Thursday cleared Ford Motor Co. of all four claims in a class action alleging that a rear suspension defect in certain Focus vehicles could cause premature tire wear.
-
September 26, 2016
Ford Focus Owners Granted Cert. In Suspension Defect Suit
A California federal judge on Friday granted certification to a proposed class of car owners suing Ford Motor Co. over potentially hazardous tire wear resulting from a rear suspension defect in some Focus models after the Ninth Circuit in December overturned a district court's decision in favor of the automaker.
-
June 21, 2013
Ford Fends Off Focus Suspension Defect Class Cert. Bid
A California federal judge denied a bid for class certification on Tuesday in a suit claiming Ford Motor Co. sold Focus sedans with a rear suspension defect that caused potentially hazardous premature tire wear, saying the suit raised too many individualized questions to justify class treatment.