Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Lugo v. Bank of America, N.A.
Case Number:
7:11-cv-07955
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 29, 2012
BofA Says Allegedly Excess Insurance Policies Were Proper
Bank of America NA on Monday urged a judge to dismiss a putative class action claiming it forced a New York homeowner to buy more hazard insurance than her mortgage agreement or federal law required, saying her agreement allowed the bank to buy the insurance on her behalf.
-
November 09, 2011
BofA Forced Excessive Policies On Homeowners: Suit
A New York homeowner launched a putative class action Monday accusing Bank of America NA of forcing her to buy more hazard insurance than was required by her mortgage agreement or federal law.