Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
February 02, 2012
Oreck Corporation Halo Vacuum Air Purifiers Marketing
Case Number:
2:12-ml-02317
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Bradley Arant
- Burr & Forman
- Bursor & Fisher
- Faruqi & Faruqi
- Fears Nachawati
- Hawxhurst Harris
- Kelley Drye
- Keogh Law Ltd.
- Kirtland & Packard
- Pachulski Stang
- Piscitelli Law Firm
- Reinhart Boerner
- Stinson LLP
- Thornton Davis
- Winston & Strawn
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
April 07, 2014
Oreck Pays $2M To Clean Up Germ-Killing Vacuum Ad Row
A Tennessee bankruptcy judge on Monday signed off on a settlement, worth as much as $2 million, of a multidistrict litigation class action accusing Oreck Corp. of false advertising over claims its vacuum cleaners could purify the air of germs.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login