Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Case Number:
5:12-cv-00630
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Alston & Bird
- ArentFox Schiff
- Baker & Hostetler
- Cadwell Clonts
- Charhon Callahan
- Coblentz Patch
- Cooley LLP
- Crowell & Moring
- DLA Piper
- Gibson Dunn
- Hawkinson Yang
- Hawxhurst Harris
- Jones Day
- Kilpatrick Townsend
- King & Siegel
- King & Spalding
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Manatt Phelps
- Maschoff Brennan
- McKool Smith
- Morrison Foerster
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Perkins Coie
- Quinn Emanuel
- Radice Law Firm
- Reed Smith
- Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP
- Russ August & Kabat
- Seyfarth Shaw
- Sheppard Mullin
- Sidley Austin
- Skiermont Derby
- Squire Patton
- Steptoe LLP
- Vedder Price
- Warren Lex
- Williams & Connolly
- WilmerHale
- Wilson Sonsini
- Winston & Strawn
Companies
- Apple Inc.
- Broadcom Inc.
- Google LLC
- HTC Corporation
- Intel Corp.
- International Business Machines Corp.
- Microsoft Corp.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- Nokia Corp.
- OmniVision Technologies, Inc.
- Oracle Corp.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 07, 2014
Samsung Fights Apple's Push For Royalties In Patent Case
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. urged a California federal judge on Monday to reject Apple Inc.'s demand that Samsung pay an ongoing royalty for sales of products found to infringe Apple's smartphone patents, saying that royalties are barred by the jury's $120 million damages verdict.
-
September 18, 2014
John Quinn Letter Saves Samsung From Nokia's Doc Demands
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. doesn't need to hand over to Nokia Corp. more documents about Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP's disclosure of confidential license details during Samsung's patent war with Apple Inc., a California federal judge ruled Wednesday, finding that founding partner John Quinn has already promised the information was destroyed.
-
September 10, 2014
Samsung Can't Shake $120M Apple Patent Verdict
A California federal judge on Tuesday denied Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.'s bid to set aside a jury's $120 million verdict over Apple Inc. smartphone patents, ruling there was enough conflicting evidence to support the jury's decision that Samsung infringed valid Apple patents.
-
September 09, 2014
Apple Loses Bid For New Trial In $120M Samsung Patent Case
A California federal judge denied Apple Inc.'s motion for a new trial Monday in a case where a jury found Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. infringed Apple's smartphone patents and awarded $120 million in damages, ruling that Apple failed to show Samsung had made "prejudicial" statements that lowered the verdict.
-
September 04, 2014
Apple Wants Samsung To Pay Ongoing Royalty In Patent Case
Having lost its bid for a ban on sales of Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. smartphones found to infringe its patents, Apple Inc. asked a California federal judge on Wednesday to order Samsung to pay an ongoing royalty for sales of the devices in the amount of $6.46 per unit sold.
-
August 29, 2014
Apple To Bring Denial Of Samsung Injunction To Fed. Circ.
Apple Inc. said Friday that it would appeal to the Federal Circuit a California federal judge's refusal to permanently ban Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. from selling several mobile phones and tablets that a jury recently found infringed Apple's patents.
-
August 27, 2014
Apple Denied Ban On Samsung Devices In Smartphone War
A California federal judge on Wednesday refused to permanently ban Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. from selling several mobile phones and tablets that a jury recently found infringed Apple Inc. patents, ruling Apple hadn't shown that it would suffer irreparable harm to its reputation.
-
August 21, 2014
Samsung Strikes Out In Bid To Nix Apple Patents Under Alice
A California federal judge on Thursday denied a motion by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. arguing that under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice Corp. decision, two Apple Inc. smartphone patents are invalid for claiming abstract ideas, ruling that Samsung waited too long to raise the issue.
-
August 07, 2014
Samsung Says USPTO Invalidation Dooms $120M Apple Trial Win
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. bolstered its argument Thursday for a California federal judge to throw out Apple Inc.'s $120 million smartphone patent victory, pointing to a recent U.S. Patent and Trademark Office decision nixing part of an Apple patent that Samsung had sought to invalidate in a post-trial motion.
-
July 25, 2014
Samsung Says It Can Still Use Alice To Nix 2 Apple Patents
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. hit back against Apple Inc. on Thursday, rejecting the iPad maker's claim that Samsung "waived long ago" its right to seek invalidation in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Alice Corp. ruling of two patents in an infringement suit that netted Apple $120 million.