Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Laughlin v. Target Corporation
Case Number:
0:12-cv-00489
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 27, 2012
Target Can't Kick Class Action Over Toning Shoe Ads
A Minnesota federal judge ruled Friday that Target Corp. must face a proposed class action alleging it deceptively marketed its TrimStep toning shoes and citing scientific studies that allegedly showed other, similar shoes didn't offer their advertised health benefits.
-
February 27, 2012
Target's Toning Shoe Ads Deceptive: Suit
Target Corp. deceived its consumers by claiming its line of TrimStep toning shoes improved a wearer's fitness and posture, even though scientific studies discredit those statements, according to a putative class action removed Friday to Minnesota federal court.