Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Navajo Nation, The, et al. v. Urban Outfitters, Inc. et al

  1. October 03, 2016

    Navajo Nation, Urban Outfitters Settle Trademark Dispute

    Urban Outfitters said Monday that it is putting the finishing touches on a deal that resolved the Navajo Nation's high-profile suit alleging the retailer and two subsidiaries infringed the tribe's trademark rights by illegally selling goods under the "Navajo" and "Navaho" names.

  2. September 20, 2016

    Navajo Bid For Quick Win Nixed In Urban Outfitters TM Row

    A New Mexico federal judge ruled that the Navajo Nation hadn't proved Urban Outfitters infringed on the tribe's trademark rights under the Lanham Act by selling goods under the "Navajo" and "Navaho" names, denying the tribe's bid for summary judgment on those claims Monday.

  3. September 06, 2016

    Insurer Can't Intervene In Urban Outfitters Navajo TM Suit

    Urban Outfitters' insurance carrier can't insert itself into litigation brought by the Navajo Nation over claims of tribal trademark infringement because it's not directly involved in the lawsuit, a New Mexico federal judge ruled on Tuesday.

  4. August 31, 2016

    Navajos, Urban Outfitters Eye Settlement Talks In TM Row

    The Navajo Nation and Urban Outfitters jointly asked a New Mexico federal judge on Tuesday to push back the potential start of a trial in the tribe's suit claiming the retailer used its "Navajo" trademarks illegally, saying both parties want to focus on reaching a settlement.

  5. July 06, 2016

    Navajo Knock Down Another Affirmative Defense In TM Row

    Urban Outfitters Inc. can't contend the Navajo Nation used its "Navajo" trademarks illegally or with malicious intent, a New Mexico federal judge said Tuesday, but left open the possibility that the retailer's use of the term "Navajo" on its products could be protected by fair use.

  6. May 26, 2016

    Navajos Beat One Of Urban Outfitters' Defenses In TM Row

    A New Mexico federal judge on Thursday nixed an affirmative defense from Urban Outfitters Inc. with respect to subsidiary Free People of PA LLC in the Navajo Nation’s trademark suit against the retailer, saying the tribe did not wait too long to attempt to recover damages.

  7. May 19, 2016

    Navajo Can Seek Per-Product Damages In TM Suit, Judge Says

    A New Mexico federal judge on Thursday rejected a bid to limit potential damages available to the Navajo Nation for claims under the Indian Arts and Crafts Act in a trademark suit against Urban Outfitters, saying a higher potential damages calculation supported the law's purpose of protecting tribes and consumers.

  8. May 13, 2016

    Urban Outfitters Beats Navajo Nation's TM Dilution Claims

    Urban Outfitters partially dodged a trademark suit lodged by the Navajo Nation when a New Mexico federal judge on Friday tossed trademark dilution claims, saying the Navajo mark isn't so famous as to make it a nationally recognized household mark eligible for protection.

  9. April 27, 2016

    Urban Outfitters Says Navajo Nation Shouldn't Get Do-Over

    Urban Outfitters urged a New Mexico federal court Tuesday not to reconsider allowing its subsidiary, Free People of PA LLC, to rely on new evidence from two employees in the Navajo Nation's trademark infringement suit against the retailer, saying the tribe must face the consequences of a strategic miscalculation.

  10. April 06, 2016

    Urban Outfitters Insurer Says It Belongs In Navajo TM Case

    Urban Outfitters' insurance carrier continued to push Wednesday to get involved in litigation brought by the Navajo Nation over claims of tribal trademark infringement, asserting that the clothing retailer has misrepresented that the insurer is merely trying to cut its own costs through its bid to add juror questions to the case.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!