Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Liberty Harbor Holding, LLC
Case Number:
2:12-bk-19958
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Becker LLC
- Chiesa Shahinian
- Cole Schotz
- Genova Burns
- McElroy Deutsch
- McManimon Scotland
- Saul Ewing
- Scarpone & Vargo
- Schumann Hanlon
- Stark & Stark
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 20, 2013
NJ Developer Faces Ch. 11 Challenge Over $350M Land Row
A management company with a stake in the $350 million Jersey City, N.J., property at the center of Liberty Harbor Holding LLC's proposed Chapter 11 reorganization plan urged a New Jersey bankruptcy court Thursday not to confirm the plan until a real estate dispute is resolved.
-
November 14, 2013
Liberty Harbor Accused Of Forum Shopping In Ch. 11 Case
A management company with a stake in the $350 million of Jersey City, N.J., real estate that's at the center of Liberty Harbor Holding LLC's Chapter 11 reorganization plan accused the developer on Tuesday of failing to provide key details on litigation over the property's ownership and of playing "ping-pong" with its claims.
-
May 10, 2012
Bankrupt NJ Developer Sues Partner Over 'Invalid' Deed
Bankrupt New Jersey real estate development group Liberty Harbor Holding LLC hit a former business partner with an adversary suit Thursday, claiming a deed the partner purports to hold on a joint development is not valid.