Coverage
-
July 11, 2016
A tea drinker who claims Bigelow misled him on its labels about the amount of antioxidants in its teas fought the company's bid for a quick win Friday, telling a California federal judge that the company's alleged lies — which he maintains he relied on when deciding to purchase the herbal beverage — are not protected by free speech laws.
1 other articles on this case.
View all »