Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Morrissey v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee, Inc.
Case Number:
2:12-cv-02359
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 21, 2012
State Regulations Provide Antitrust Immunity, Blue Cross Says
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee Inc. asked a federal judge to throw out a putative antitrust class action on Monday, claiming the insurance provider is immune to federal and state antitrust laws since state regulators approved the allegedly inflated premiums.
-
May 14, 2012
Blue Cross Hit With Market Allocation Suit In Tenn.
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee was hit Thursday with an antitrust class action by a customer claiming the health insurance giant conspired with other BCBS plans nationwide to divide geographic markets, creating a monopoly that illegally inflated premiums for thousands of policyholders.