Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
May 16, 2012
Rockwell Automation Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Case Number:
3:12-cv-02495
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Crowell & Moring
- Duane Morris
- Freitas & Weinberg
- Gibson Dunn
- K&L Gates
- Morrison Foerster
- Nossaman LLP
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- White & Case
Companies
- AU Optronics Corp.
- Chimei Innolux Corp.
- Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.
- LG Display Co. Ltd.
- NEC Corp.
- Renesas Electronics Corp.
- Rockwell Automation Inc.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Sharp Corp.
- Toshiba Corp.
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
January 16, 2013
LG Loses Bid To Claim Double Recovery In LCD MDL
A California federal judge on Tuesday refused to let LG Display Co. Ltd. argue that Rockwell Automation Inc.'s state price-fixing claims would lead to duplicative recovery in the multidistrict litigation over liquid crystal display panels.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login