Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Khasin v. R. C. Bigelow, Inc.
Case Number:
3:12-cv-02204
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 10, 2016
Bigelow Ducks Tea Label Suits, Setting Up 9th Circ. Battle
A California federal judge on Wednesday tossed two putative class actions alleging R.C. Bigelow Inc.'s teas inaccurately promise antioxidant health benefits, a move the consumers' attorney said he welcomed as a chance to take their fight to the Ninth Circuit.
-
July 11, 2016
Tea Drinkers Hit Back At Bigelow's Bid To End Antioxidant Suit
A tea drinker who claims Bigelow misled him on its labels about the amount of antioxidants in its teas fought the company's bid for a quick win Friday, telling a California federal judge that the company's alleged lies — which he maintains he relied on when deciding to purchase the herbal beverage — are not protected by free speech laws.
-
March 30, 2016
Bigelow Tea Drinkers' Class Cert. Bid Denied In False Ad Row
A consumer's bid to certify a group of tea drinkers accusing R.C. Bigelow Inc. of misleading them about the amount of antioxidants in its teas was struck down on Tuesday, after a California federal judge concluded that the proposed damage theories were inappropriate and future harm was unlikely.
-
January 20, 2016
Bigelow Tea Buyers Seek Cert. In Antioxidant False Ad Row
Dissatisfied tea drinkers urged a California federal court Wednesday to certify a class of Californians who say R.C. Bigelow Inc. misled them about the amount of antioxidants in its teas, saying all the products they purchased bore the same false labels.
-
September 15, 2015
Bigelow Faces Class Cert. Bids Over Green, Black Tea Labels
Dissatisfied tea drinkers moved for class certification against R.C. Bigelow Inc. in California federal court on Monday, claiming in separate suits that they paid a premium for the company's teas when the products don't actually contain high levels of antioxidants as indicated on Bigelow's labels.
-
August 12, 2015
Tea Co. Keeps Profit Info Under Wraps In Labeling Row
A California federal judge shut down a proposed class representative's quest for information on R.C. Bigelow Inc.'s profits on Wednesday, saying he is only entitled to seek what consumers allegedly overpaid for the company's tea because of its labels — not a chunk of the company's entire profits.
-
July 13, 2015
Bigelow Tea Drinkers File Fresh Health-Benefit Claims
After a California federal judge ruled that a complaint against R.C. Bigelow Inc. amounted to a "treatise" on federal regulations, two plaintiffs filed separate amended complaints Friday over green and black teas, respectively, clarifying how they were misled about the products' health benefits.
-
April 05, 2013
Bigelow Asks Judge To Ice Suit Over Tea's Health Claims
R.C. Bigelow Inc. urged a California federal judge Thursday to throw out a putative class action accusing the tea company of falsely advertising the health benefits of antioxidants, arguing that the plaintiff didn't identify how he was misled and wasn't injured by any company products.