Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Janna Herrera et al v. The Estee Lauder Companies Inc et al
Case Number:
8:12-cv-01169
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 16, 2012
Estee Lauder, Mary Kay Seek Appeal In Animal Testing Row
The Estee Lauder Cos. Inc. and Mary Kay Inc. asked a California federal judge on Monday to let them appeal recent decisions in two putative class actions alleging they failed to properly disclose their animal testing practices, saying the rulings put too broad a disclosure duty on manufacturers.
-
September 21, 2012
Judge Pares Animal Testing Claims Against Makeup Giants
A California federal judge on Thursday trimmed fraudulent advertising claims in three putative class actions seeking to hold Mary Kay Inc., Estee Lauder Inc. and Avon Products Inc. liable for allegedly misleading customers about their animal testing practices.