Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Churchill Downs Incorporated v. Trout et al
Case Number:
1:12-cv-00880
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Constitutional - State Statute
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 24, 2013
Texas Says Churchill Downs Can't Lift Ban On Online Bets
The Texas Racing Commission on Monday asked a Texas federal court to find state laws that bar online gambling but allow in-person wagers on horse races don't violate the constitutional commerce clause, in its response to a suit from Churchill Downs Inc. that seeks to overturn the online ban.
-
September 25, 2012
Kentucky Derby Operator Challenges Texas Betting Law
Churchill Downs Inc. and a subsidiary that operates the online betting site Twinspires.com sued the Texas Racing Commission in federal court Friday, arguing a state law unconstitutionally discriminates against online betting businesses by allowing Texas citizens to bet on horse races only in person.