Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
USA, et al v. Caremark, Inc, et al
Case Number:
5:12-cv-00929
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Chamberlain Hrdlicka
- Clark Hill
- Ford Murray PLLC
- Fox Rothschild
- Graves Dougherty
- Holland & Knight
- Husch Blackwell
- Kuhn Hobbs
- Naman Howell
- Polsinelli PC
- Winston & Strawn
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 02, 2013
CVS Caremark Puts Up $4M To End FCA Suit
A CVS Caremark Corp. unit will pay $4.25 million to the federal government and five states to settle a False Claims Act whistleblower suit alleging it defrauded government insurance programs by not reimbursing expenses that should have been covered by private insurers, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.
-
April 19, 2013
$4M Caremark Deal Not Tied To Fee Row, Whistleblower Says
Whistleblower Janaki Ramadoss on Thursday told a Texas federal judge that her bid for attorneys' fees from Caremark Rx Inc. should proceed, rebuffing Caremark's claim that its $4.25 million settlement of a False Claims Act suit alleging it defrauded government insurance programs is dependent upon the fee issue being resolved.