Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Love et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

  1. November 19, 2015

    Wal-Mart Workers Can't Intervene In Settled Bias Suit

    A Florida federal judge refused to allow eight female Wal-Mart workers to intervene in a gender bias suit against the company that had already been settled, finding in an order posted Thursday that the court no longer had jurisdiction over the proposed class action they sought to revive.

  2. November 16, 2015

    Wal-Mart Says Proposed Intervenors In Bias Suit Lack Standing

    Wal-Mart slammed a move by eight woman seeking to intervene and revive a regional gender discrimination suit against the retail giant in a federal court filing Friday, saying not only do the women lack standing to sue, but their claims are untimely and unable to pass class action threshold requirements.

  3. October 20, 2015

    Wal-Mart Settles With Women In Fla. Gender Bias Suit

    Wal-Mart has settled a regional gender discrimination suit filed against it by women in a Florida federal court, resolving claims lodged after the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark Dukes decision disbanded a nationwide class.

  4. December 03, 2013

    Women Win 11th Circ. Appeal Bid In Fla. Wal-Mart Bias Suit

    A Florida federal judge on Tuesday allowed women who brought a regional gender bias lawsuit against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. to try to revive their class claims, finding that recent high court precedent may have affected the grounds for their dismissal.

  5. November 26, 2013

    Women Fight For Quick Appeal In Fla. Wal-Mart Bias Suit

    Women who brought a regional gender bias lawsuit against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. following the U.S. Supreme Court's Dukes ruling urged a Florida federal court to allow a quick appeal of the dismissal of their class claims, arguing that recent high court precedent had changed the legal landscape.

  6. November 04, 2013

    Wal-Mart Says Quick Appeal Won't Advance Post-Dukes Case

    Wal-Mart Stores Inc. asked a Florida federal judge on Friday not to grant an appeal to women whose gender bias class claims were dismissed, saying the applied precedent required dismissal and that an interlocutory appeal will not materially advance the litigation.

  7. October 16, 2013

    Ex-Dukes Members Want Quick Appeal In Fla. Sex Bias Case

    Women who lodged regional gender bias claims against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. — after the U.S. Supreme Court disbanded the nationwide class in Wal-Mart v. Dukes in 2011 — asked a Florida federal court on Tuesday for permission to immediately appeal a recent ruling that time-barred their class claims.

  8. September 24, 2013

    Wal-Mart Gets Dukes Members' Class Bias Claims Nixed Again

    A Florida federal judge on Monday dismissed class claims in a sex discrimination suit against Wal-Mart Stores Inc., joining three other federal judges who've held that women in the nationwide Dukes class disbanded in 2011 couldn't pursue regional claims against Wal-Mart on a class basis.

  9. September 04, 2013

    Ex-Dukes Members Fight To Keep Wal-Mart Bias Suit Alive

    Former members of the disbanded nationwide Dukes class of female Wal-Mart Stores Inc. workers on Wednesday asked a Florida federal judge to allow their regional gender bias suit against the retail giant to proceed to discovery.

  10. August 06, 2013

    Wal-Mart Uses Dukes Cert. Denial As Ammo In Fla. Battle

    Wal-Mart Stores Inc. used a failed bid to certify a narrowed class in the Dukes gender bias suit as ammunition Monday in the retailer's pending challenge to class claims lodged in Florida by ex-members of the nationwide Dukes class the U.S. Supreme Court disbanded in 2011.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!