Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Biomet M2A Magnum Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation (MDL 2391)
Case Number:
3:12-md-02391
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Anapol Weiss
- Barnes & Thornburg
- Beasley Allen
- Faegre Drinker
- Gomez Trial Attorneys
- Hovde Dassow
- Lanier Law Firm
- Patterson Belknap
- Searcy Denney
- SouthBank Legal LLC
- Thornton Law Firm LLP
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 03, 2014
Biomet To Pay $56M To Settle Hip Replacement MDL
Biomet Inc. on Monday said it would pay at least $56 million to settle multidistrict litigation in Indiana federal court that claims it made defective metal-on-metal hip implants.
-
August 22, 2013
Biomet's Preemption Bid Fails In Metal Hip Implant MDL
An Indiana federal judge declined Wednesday to dismiss a lawsuit in multidistrict litigation against Biomet Inc. over its allegedly defective metal-on-metal hip implants, ruling it is not preempted by federal law just because the device at issue was approved for use in a clinical investigation.
-
July 03, 2013
Courts Endorse New Data-Sorting Formulas For E-Discovery
In the first half of 2013, federal courts gave law firms and their clients some much-needed guidance on e-discovery, issuing several rulings that clarify how they should use an emerging method for sorting through reams of data and rebuking those that offer lazy replies to discovery requests.