Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Villa v. San Francisco Forty Niners, Ltd et al

  1. November 18, 2016

    Final OK Given To $5M Deal In NFL, Reebok Antitrust Suit

    A California federal judge has given final approval to a $4.75 million settlement in a proposed class action brought by apparel customers who claimed Reebok's exclusive NFL licensing deal violated antitrust laws.

  2. July 18, 2016

    Attys Seek $1.5M Fees From NFL, Reebok Antitrust Row

    Lawyers for apparel customers who scored a $4.75 million settlement in a class action that claimed Reebok Inc.'s exclusive NFL licensing deal violated antitrust laws asked a California federal judge on Monday to award them over $1.5 million for their work.

  3. February 26, 2016

    NFL, Reebok To Pay $4.75M To Settle Apparel Antitrust Suit

    The NFL and Reebok Inc. reached a $4.75 million settlement agreement in California federal court on Thursday, in a proposed class action brought by apparel customers who claimed Reebok's exclusive NFL licensing deal violated antitrust laws.

  4. May 14, 2015

    Reebok Customers Denied Quick Win In NFL Apparel Fight

    A California federal judge on Wednesday refused to find the NFL and Adidas AG unit Reebok International Ltd. liable in a putative class action brought by apparel customers who claimed Reebok's exclusive NFL licensing deal violated antitrust laws, ruling that the plaintiff's motion was procedurally improper.

  5. January 22, 2015

    Buyers Say NFL, Reebok Licensing Deals Harmed Competition

    A proposed class of National Football League-branded apparel buyers urged a California federal judge Thursday to find that the NFL and Reebok International Ltd. are liable under federal antitrust laws for entering into exclusive licensing deals the buyers say stifled competition.

  6. January 08, 2015

    NFL, Reebok Blast Class Cert. Data In Antitrust Suit

    The National Football League and Reebok International Ltd. have urged a California federal judge to ignore economic data supporting a bid for class certification in an antitrust suit accusing them of hatching exclusive merchandise licensing deals, saying the "sandbagging" data was belatedly and improperly submitted.

  7. August 28, 2014

    NFL Branding Antitrust Suit To Lose Its Lead Plaintiff

    A consumer who filed an antitrust class action against the National Football League and Reebok International Ltd. over their exclusive merchandise licensing deals intends to drop out because of health issues, according to a case management statement filed Thursday in a California federal court.

  8. April 17, 2014

    Consumer Rushes NFL's Bid To Nix State Antitrust Claims

    A consumer suing the National Football League and Reebok International Ltd. over their exclusive licensing deal blasted their bid to toss the state-law claims from his putative class action, telling a California federal court Wednesday that professional football is not immune from consumer claims under the state's antitrust law.

  9. August 02, 2013

    NFL, Reebok Can't Shake Antitrust Suit Over Licensing Deal

    A California federal judge declined Friday to toss a putative antitrust class action challenging the National Football League's exclusive licensing deal with Reebok International Inc., ruling the plaintiff, a consumer, has standing to bring the case because he is a participant in the retail market for NFL products.

  10. March 27, 2013

    NFL Says Rival Gear Decks Antitrust Suit Over Reebok Deal

    The National Football League on Tuesday continued its push to ax a putative antitrust class action challenging an exclusive licensing deal with Reebok International Inc., telling a California federal judge the plaintiff has conceded that NFL apparel competes with apparel from other sources.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!