Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Ward et al v. Apple Inc.
Case Number:
4:12-cv-05404
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 16, 2018
IPhone Buyers Lose Cert. Bid In AT&T Exclusivity Fight
A California federal judge has declined to certify a class of iPhone buyers who allege Apple Inc. violated antitrust laws by locking them into voice and data plans with AT&T, finding Friday the consumers' damages expert's report lacked "any data-driven analysis."
-
February 06, 2018
IPhone Buyers 'Trying To Bluff' Through Cert. Bid, Apple Says
A group of consumers urged a California federal judge Tuesday to certify a class of iPhone buyers who allege Apple violated antitrust laws by locking them into voice and data plans with AT&T, while Apple countered that the consumers are "trying to bluff their way through class certification."
-
November 14, 2017
Apple Says IPhone Buyers' Class Cert. Bid Ignores Reality
Apple Inc. urged a California federal court Monday to reject a class certification bid by a group of consumers who accused the iPhone maker of locking them into voice and data plans with AT&T, saying the phone buyers were being "deliberately indifferent" to earlier rulings trimming their case.
-
August 16, 2017
IPhone Buyers Ask For Cert. In AT&T Exclusivity Suit
A group of consumers accusing Apple Inc. of conspiring with AT&T to lock iPhone customers into the carrier's voice and data plans asked for class certification on Tuesday, citing common threads in the customers' complaints.
-
March 22, 2017
Apple Can't Fully Dodge Antitrust Row Over AT&T iPhone Deal
A putative class action accusing Apple Inc. of conspiring with AT&T to lock in iPhone customers to the carrier's voice and data plans moved forward Wednesday when a California federal judge said there was evidence Apple may have manipulated a market centered around such service plans.
-
January 31, 2017
Apple Fights Antitrust Suit Over AT&T IPhone Deal
Apple Inc. urged a California federal judge at a hearing Tuesday to throw out class action claims it violated antitrust laws by locking iPhone customers into voice and data plans with AT&T Mobility, saying customers knew they wouldn't be able to unlock their phones and switch carriers when they signed an exclusivity agreement.
-
November 28, 2016
Apple Says Consumers Repeating Arguments In Antitrust Suit
Apple Inc. on Friday asked a California federal judge to prevent consumers from filing an additional reply brief in their proposed class action that claims the tech giant conspired with AT&T Mobility to monopolize an aftermarket for iPhone voice and data services, saying the consumers are trying to duplicate arguments.
-
March 29, 2016
Apple Aims To End Antitrust Suit Over AT&T IPhone Pact
Apple Inc. continued its push to toss a proposed consumer class action that claims Apple and AT&T Mobility conspired to monopolize an aftermarket for iPhone voice and data services, arguing during a Tuesday hearing in California federal court that the sale of the phones and service plans was part of the same transaction, so there was no aftermarket.
-
February 24, 2016
Apple Says There Wasn't Aftermarket For AT&T To Monopolize
Apple again pushed a California federal court to toss customers' putative antitrust class action over an exclusive iPhone deal with AT&T, arguing Tuesday that the kind of aftermarket monopoly the agreement allegedly created simply did not exist.
-
February 17, 2016
Consumers Slice Apple's Bid To Toss AT&T Antitrust Suit
Apple customers struck back Tuesday against the company's bid to toss their putative class action over an exclusive iPhone deal with AT&T, telling a California federal judge the deal created the kind of aftermarket monopoly that U.S. courts have declared illegal.