Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
RIPL Corp. v. Google Inc.
Case Number:
2:12-cv-02050
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 04, 2014
Google 'Ripples' Don't Infringe Ripl Trademark, Court Says
A Washington federal judge on Thursday ruled that Google Inc. didn't infringe trademarked software with an advertising and content-sharing component of Google+ because Seattle-based Ripl Corp. had abandoned uses of its service mark.
-
November 26, 2012
Google 'Ripples' Infringe Ripl Trademark, Suit Says
A social networking company hit Google Inc. with a suit in Washington federal court Wednesday, alleging an advertising and content-sharing component of the Internet giant's Google+ infringes on its similar trademarked software.