Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. Export-Import Bank of the United States et al
Case Number:
4:12-cv-06325
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Government Agencies
-
April 12, 2016
Ex-Im Bank Cleared From Enviros' Aussie LNG Loan Suit
A California federal judge will not block the Export-Import Bank of the U.S. from making good on its $4.8 billion loans to two Australian liquefied natural gas projects in the Great Barrier Reef, shutting down environmental groups who said the agency skipped over required environmental analyses.
-
July 20, 2015
Enviros Push Bid To End Funding Of Aussie LNG Projects
The Center for Biological Diversity urged a California federal judge on Friday to halt Export-Import Bank of the U.S. funding of Australian liquefied natural gas projects in the Great Barrier Reef.
-
May 21, 2015
Ex-Im Bank Fights Enviros' Challenge To LNG Project
Halting U.S. Export-Import Bank funding of Australian liquefied natural gas projects in the Great Barrier Reef will not stop the projects or address the claims of environmental groups, the bank argued before a California federal judge on Wednesday.
-
April 03, 2015
Ex-Im Bank Flouted ESA By Funding LNG Project, Enviros Say
The U.S. Export-Import Bank clearly ignored the risks to endangered species and sensitive habitat when it pumped $4.8 billion into Australian liquid natural gas projects in the Great Barrier Reef, a trio of environmental groups said Thursday, urging a California federal judge for a quick victory in their lawsuit against the bank.
-
February 23, 2015
Ex-Im Bank Stuck With ESA Suit In Barrier Reef LNG Projects
A California federal judge said Friday the U.S. Export-Import Bank can't escape a lawsuit alleging its funding of Australian liquid natural gas projects in the Great Barrier Reef violates the Endangered Species Act because the project may occur partially in international waters.
-
August 12, 2014
CORRECTED: Agency-Funded Overseas Projects Ruled Exempt From ESA
A California federal judge on Tuesday trimmed a suit challenging U.S. funding for two Australian liquefied natural gas projects on environmental grounds, ruling the Endangered Species Act does not apply to agency-funded projects overseas, but gave the plaintiffs a chance to amend their complaint. (Correction: An earlier story mistakenly indicated the entire complaint had been dismissed. The error has been corrected.)
-
October 18, 2013
High-Stakes ESA Fight Threatens Overseas Development
Environmental groups are charging ahead with a beefed-up lawsuit challenging U.S. funding of a massive Australian liquid natural gas terminal by arguing Endangered Species Act protections apply, picking a fight that experts say could jeopardize the prospects of many future U.S.-linked projects abroad.