Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
SANFORD et al v. BRACEWELL LLP
Case Number:
2:13-cv-01205
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 21, 2017
Bracewell Trying To 'Bully' Us In Malpractice Row: Couple
A couple suing Bracewell LLP for allegedly blowing an effort to recoup a $12.5 million investment told a Pennsylvania federal court Friday that they’ve been punished enough by being forced to arbitrate and shouldn’t face an additional penalty.
-
August 04, 2017
Bracewell Wants Sanctions Against Couple In Malpractice Suit
Bracewell LLP urged a Pennsylvania federal judge Friday to make a couple suing the firm for malpractice pay for 16 months of attorneys' fees and costs, saying they had failed to support a longstanding claim that the expense of arbitration was beyond their means.
-
June 28, 2017
Couple Suing Bracewell Must Pay For Arbitration, Judge Says
A Pennsylvania federal judge on Wednesday gave a couple with a $12.5 million malpractice suit against Bracewell LLP a last chance to put up cash for arbitration proceedings or see their case thrown out.
-
February 10, 2015
Keep $13M Bracewell Malpractice Suit In Court, 3rd Circ. Told
The Third Circuit was urged Monday to uphold a ruling that a $12.5 million malpractice suit launched against Bracewell & Giuliani LLP should be heard by a jury for a decision on its arbitrability, with the plaintiffs saying the jury needs to decide if a valid contract exists between them and the firm.
-
March 21, 2014
$13M Bracewell Malpractice Row Heads To Jury
A Pennsylvania federal judge on Thursday said that it was up to the state's Supreme Court to decide the scope of arbitration clauses in contracts clients sign with law firms in his ruling that a $12.5 million malpractice suit launched against Bracewell & Giuliani LLP needed to go to a jury for a decision on its arbitrability.
-
November 06, 2013
Bracewell Pushes For Arbitration In $13M Malpractice Suit
Bracewell & Giuliani LLP told a Pennsylvania federal judge Wednesday that a dispute over whether a husband and wife pursuing a $12.5 million malpractice claim against the firm could both be considered bona fide clients did not block the case from being sent to arbitration.
-
October 18, 2013
Couple Fights Arbitration In Bracewell Malpractice Row
A couple suing Bracewell & Giuliani LLP for malpractice over the firm's alleged failure to recover $12.5 million lost in a botched investment deal told a Pennsylvania federal judge last week that a dispute over one plaintiff's status as a client should block the case from being arbitrated.
-
March 08, 2013
Bracewell Takes $13M Malpractice Battle To Federal Court
Bracewell & Giuliani LLP wants a malpractice suit — which alleges the firm failed to recover $12.5 million for a Pennsylvania couple after a botched investment deal — removed to federal court in Philadelphia, saying in court filings Tuesday that the firm has no attorneys practicing in the state.