May 20, 2013

Procter & Gamble Company v. CAO Group, Inc.

Track this case

Case Number:

1:13-cv-00337

Court:

Ohio Southern

Nature of Suit:

Patent

Judge:

Timothy S. Black

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity


Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.


Coverage

  1. December 01, 2014

    PTAB Refuses To Review P&G's Crest Whitestrips Patents

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has refused to institute inter partes review of three patents covering Procter & Gamble Co.'s  teeth-whitening product Crest Whitestrips, ruling that accused infringer CAO Group Inc. failed to show the patents are likely invalid.

2 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!